No cheating, the honor system applies!
- About
- Background Noise
- Cameo Cards
- Cards That Never Were
Gallery 1959 Ted Williams 1960 Ted Williams 1961 Ted Williams 1966 Yogi Berra 1967 Sandy Koufax 1972 Carlton Fisk 1972 Ernie Banks 1974 Willie Mays 1975 Al Kaline 1976 Bob Gibson 1976 & 1977 Frank Robinson 1976 Harmon Killebrew 1977 Hank Aaron 1977 Reggie Jackson 1978 Brooks Robinson 1980 Lou Brock 1980 Thurman Munson 1981 Willie McCovey 1982 Ryne Sandberg 1983 Willie Stargell 1984 Gaylord Perry 1985 Jim Palmer 1988 Reggie Jackson 1990 Mike Schmidt 1991 Jerry Reuss
- Name the Game
- Oh, Wow...
- Pwn3d
- Redefine the Design
- Spot the Ǝrror
1967 Topps - 3rd Series Checklist 1969 Topps - Ron Perranoski 1971 Topps - 2nd Series Checklist 1974 Topps - Rookie Pitchers 1979 Topps - Bump Wills 1981 Fleer - Graig Nettles 1982 Donruss - San Diego Chicken 1982 Fleer - John Littlefield 1982 Topps - George Foster 1989 Fleer - Keith Moreland 1989 Score - Jose Rijo 1989 Score - Paul Gibson 1989 Topps - Jimy Williams 1990 Fleer - Cal Ripken 1991 Fleer - Andre Dawson 1991 Score - Kent Anderson 1991 Topps - Pat Borders
- Stories & Thoughts
- Wanted!
- Inventory
Friday, December 21, 2012
Spot the Ǝrror - 1989 Topps Jimy Williams
This is the first in a new series comparing error and corrected card versions. If you spot the error, leave a comment. First one to correctly identify the difference between the two cards wins the round. "Standings" will be updated continually with an eventual prize.
No cheating, the honor system applies!
No cheating, the honor system applies!
Labels:
1989 Topps,
Jimy Williams,
Spot the Error
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Dave Stieb's 1989 Topps card number on the back has been changed from #460 to #468.
Incorrect. Please try again!
Holy smokes... I just spent 10 minutes flipping back and forth between the two back scans. Then after 30 seconds on the front I found it. There's a white spot near the J in Jays on the left card and it's corrected with blue ink on the right card.
Good job, Fuji. +1
That's pretty clever.
Post a Comment